THE GOODS Logo - brand marketing news

What We’re Tracking: Defaultcore

Published
February 5, 2026
Kelcie Gene Papp
Co-Founder & Editor, Brand & Culture
February 5, 2026
Kelcie Gene Papp
Co-Founder & Editor, Brand & Culture

In summary

Defaultcore describes a growing class of consumer brands engineered to become the automatic choice. The shift reflects rising decision fatigue, higher emotional stakes in everyday categories, and a pull toward products that feel already approved. Design, product and language converge around cognitive ease rather than persuasion.

What does it mean when brands win by being automatic?

As Daniel Kahneman observed, people naturally conserve mental energy, especially in routine decisions, relying on familiarity and ease rather than constant evaluation. The brain prefers paths that feel settled.

From a neurological standpoint, this makes sense. The prefrontal cortex manages comparison and judgement, but it is energy-intensive. When packaging is crowded with claims, contrast, or competing signals, the cost of choosing rises. Clear hierarchy, restrained colour, and generous spacing lower that cost. Fewer signals mean fewer conflicts to resolve.

The result is comfort. A decision environment that feels calm, predictable, and safe enough to repeat. Which is precisely what everyday categories are for.

The prefrontal cortex handles evaluation and comparison, but it is metabolically expensive. When CPG packaging is cluttered, high-contrast, or claim-dense, more processing is required. Clear hierarchy, limited colour, and generous spacing take away that load. The brain no longer needs to resolve competing signals.

The Bachan’s acquisition is Defaultcore made legible

Marzetti’s agreement to acquire Bachan’s, Inc. is the clearest recent proof that incumbents are paying for automatic behaviour, not category novelty. Announced on 3 February 2026 and reported at $400m, the deal formalised Bachan’s hard work: becoming familiar enough to feel inevitable.

Our thoughts on pantry staples

The role of the modern pantry was to stabilise daily routines, not to communicate identity.

The word itself comes from the Old French paneterie, a dedicated space for bread and daily staples, kept separate from the kitchen to preserve food and regularity. Its purpose was practical from the start: to make everyday eating predictable.

Post-war domestic design carried this forward. Built-in cupboards, standard jars, neutral packaging. Staples were often decanted to remove branding altogether. Consistency mattered more than variety.

Over the past decade, that role fractured. Pantry items were pulled into the performance economy. Oil became artisanal. Sauce became identity. Milk became manifesto. What had once been a stabilising system turned into a display.

Defaultcore marks a reset: a return to the pantry’s original function: supporting routine, reducing choice, and making daily life feel easier to manage.

What default looks like

Cognitive scientist and design theorist Don Norman has observed that the real job of design is not to be noticed, but to remove effort. “The goal of design is to make things understandable,” he writes. 

That idea becomes most visible in the products people stop actively choosing. In my own pantry, Defaultcore shows up in what I reorder without thinking. Sriracha Green Chili Hemp Seed Oil. Naturly’s chocolate vegan protein powder. I buy them the same way I buy Yorkshire Decaf or Dragonfly tea Earl Grey Rooibos, on instinct. They’re staples. Products I trust to behave the same way every time, which is precisely why they stay.

You can see that same pattern at work in how Defaultcore appears in the market:

Brand design by Katherine Pihl, Human NYC and Emma O'Brien

Bobbie 

Bobbie’s palette? Clinical sky blue paired with regulatory green. The homepage is composed to lower anxiety. Wide spacing. Soft contrast. Nothing competes for attention. Defaultcore operating at its highest emotional stakes. 

The design stabilises and suggests the decision has already been made correctly.

Bobbie operates under different emotional conditions. In a category shaped by scrutiny and concern, its strength has come from reducing uncertainty. By narrowing choice and presenting institutional calm, the product offers reassurance.

Brand design by r.vH design

Bachan’s

The palette references the Japanese pantry approach and the bottle looks like it already belongs in the cupboard. 

In Defaultcore terms, Bachan’s is designed to be reached for. The Marzetti acquisition simply formalised what the design had already communicated: this is now baseline behaviour, not a passing trend.

Brands like Bachan’s have attracted acquisition interest because they established stability inside everyday behaviour. Over time, Bachan’s became a reliable pantry presence rather than something to rediscover. Cultural specificity was built into the product and packaging in a way that felt familiar. The value lay in how easily the same bottle could be reached for again, without pause.

Brand design by Steven Roberts

Mamame 

A fibre-forward snack brand built around legumes, chickpeas, broad beans, edamame, everyday foods recontextualised for modern snacking. It's palette sits on a muted legume greens, reds and dark browns, living in the world of dried beans and leaves. The structural blue adds order and calm.

Nothing on the pack visualises digestion. No gut diagrams. No arrows. No optimisation language. Fibre is not framed as an achievement. Mamame is allowing us to snack without consequence.

They applies the same approach to everyday nutrition. Fibre is treated as a practical input rather than a goal to optimise. Delivered through a familiar snack format and a maintenance-led design language, the product fits easily into existing habits, making repetition feel uncomplicated.

-

Taken together, all of the above has implications beyond design. For product teams, it shifts innovation toward tolerance, consistency, and repeat use. For marketers, it softens the assumption that clarity requires constant messaging. And for incumbents, it helps explain why value is increasingly attached to brands that are already embedded in routine and difficult to displace.

The final test of Defaultcore is whether a brand stops being reconsidered at all.

Two questions CMOs should ask

  1. Where are we still competing for attention in categories where our consumer is actively trying to reduce decisions?

  2. Which parts of our portfolio are designed to win the first purchase, but create friction when it comes to repeat?